Has anybody actually shot 200T?

[crimsonson]

The Vision 200T's grain is probably, what I am expecting, to be tighter than Ekta, but not even close to the micro grain of K40.

In my opinion as long as it is compareable to Ekta, I m cool with it.


------------------

[MovieStuff]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Courier, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by crimsonson:
The Vision 200T's grain is probably, what I am expecting, to be tighter than Ekta, but not even close to the micro grain of K40. In my opinion as long as it is compareable to Ekta, I m cool with it.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Well, I have yet to shoot any S8 negative but the demo tape I have from pro8mm that shows the 200 neg is grain city. What makes it more grainy than E 160 (to me) is that the grain shows up as white dancing dots in all the black areas. I don't particularly like the look, myself. The 50 asa is not bad, though.

Roger

------------------
Roger Evans
MovieStuff
http://www.afterimagephoto.tv/moviestuff.html

[Roget]

How does 200T's grain compare to Ektachrome? For that matter compared to K40? I've never shot any of the fast negative films because I simply can't imagine the grain being acceptable (This is obviously an uninformed opinion.)

I'd appreciate your informed opinions.

Regards,
Roget

------------------